e cosa ci sarebbe di strano?
Dato che non ci capisco na mazza vorrei che qualcuno mi spiegasse come si è arrivati alla definizione.
Ho delle basi in fisica e mi sono fatto un' idea (si arriva ai quark praticamente per una spiegazione decente oppure si utilizza la e=mc^2)
Boh, discuss anche basandosi su questo:
Cita:
It's confirmed: Matter is merely vacuum fluctuations
19:00 20 November 2008 by Stephen Battersby
For similar stories, visit the Quantum World Topic Guide
Matter is built on flaky foundations. Physicists have now confirmed that the apparently substantial stuff is actually no more than fluctuations in the quantum vacuum.
The researchers simulated the frantic activity that goes on sta gran ceppa di minchia terrona protons and neutrons. These particles provide almost all the mass of ordinary matter.
Each proton (or neutron) is made of three quarks - but the individual masses of these quarks only add up to about 1% of the proton's mass. So what accounts for the rest of it?
Theory says it is created by the force that binds quarks together, called the strong nuclear force. In quantum terms, the strong force is carried by a field of virtual particles called gluons, randomly popping into existence and disappearing again. The energy of these vacuum fluctuations has to be included in the total mass of the proton and neutron.
But it has taken decades to work out the actual numbers. The strong force is described by the equations of quantum chromodynamics, or QCD, which are too difficult to solve in most cases.
So physicists have developed a method called lattice QCD, which models smooth space and time as a grid of separate points. This pixellated approach allows the complexities of the strong force to be simulated approximately by computer.
Gnarly calculation
Until recently, lattice QCD calculations concentrated on the virtual gluons, and ignored another important component of the vacuum: pairs of virtual quarks and antiquarks.
Quark-antiquark pairs can pop up and momentarily transform a proton into a different, more exotic particle. In fact, the true proton is the sum of all these possibilities going on at once.
Virtual quarks make the calculations much more complicated, involving a matrix of more than 10,000 trillion numbers, says team member Stephan Dürr of the John von Neumann Institute for Computing in Jülich, Germany.
"There is no computer on Earth that could possibly store such a big matrix in its memory," Dürr told New Scientist, "so some trickery goes into evaluating it."
Crunch time
Several groups have been working out ways to handle these technical problems, and five years ago a team led by Christine Davies of the University of Glasgow, UK, managed to calculate the mass of an exotic particle called the B_c meson.
That particle contains only two quarks, making it simpler to simulate than the three-quark proton. To tackle protons and neutrons, Dürr's team used months of time on the parallel computer network at Jülich, which can handle 200 teraflops - or 200 trillion arithmetical calculations per second.
Even so, they had to tailor their code to use the network efficiently. "We spent an enormous effort to make sure our code would make optimum use of the machine," says Dürr.
Without the quarks, earlier simulations got the proton mass wrong by about 10%. With them, Dürr gets a figure within 2% of the value measured by experiments.
Higgs field
Although physicists expected theory to match experiment eventually, it is an important landmark. "The great thing is it shows that you can get close to experiments," says Davies. "Now we know that lattice QCD works, we want to make accurate calculations of particle properties, not just mass."
That will allow physicists to test QCD, and look for effects beyond known physics. For now, Dürr's calculation shows that QCD describes quark-based particles accurately, and tells us that most of our mass comes from virtual quarks and gluons fizzing away in the quantum vacuum.
The Higgs field is also thought to make a small contribution, giving mass to individual quarks as well as to electrons and some other particles. The Higgs field creates mass out of the quantum vacuum too, in the form of virtual Higgs bosons. So if the LHC confirms that the Higgs exists, it will mean all reality is virtual.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1 ... tions.htmlQualcuno conferma?
eroggeno best quote 01/12/11 [eroggeno vs. disprezzo] 
eroggeno ha scritto:
esattamente per questo non ti sei riprodotto
hai strarotto i coglioni con le tue sentenze da tuttologo
un coglione rsta un coglione anche a 60 anni ricordatelo
Login
Chat [0]
FAQ
Cerca
dipendente solo dalla massa del corpo e dal termine 
, uguale all'energia cinetica della meccanica newtoniana. L'energia E è quindi la naturale estensione dell'energia cinetica "classica". Questa formula, la più conosciuta della Fisica assieme alla 2a Legge della Dinamica di Newton , dice in sostanza che l'energia può trasformarsi in massa e viceversa: in sintesi, energia e massa sono la stessa cosa.
