Cita:
Some of those questions are pretty easy to answer.
#1 is to improve location services on the phone, particularly in urban areas where GPS lock is difficult to attain. They'll probably quibble about crapple "collecting and compiling", given that crapple isn't collecting nor compiling that data, their phone is and keeps the data to itself.
#2 is an obvious no as none of crapple's laptops have WWAN hardware built-in. Plug in a USB WWAN modem though and your carrier will most certainly be keeping similar data on their end, but since CoreLocation doesn't exist on OS X, the data would not be stored in the laptop.
#3 the current guess is that it's cell tower triangulation and the points are the locations of towers that your phone has communicated with, since AGPS data includes precise lat/long coordinates for the local tower as well as an almanac of satellite data that the tower has seen, to allow quick lock. That kind of answers #4 and #5 too.
#4's answer (assuming #3 is accurate) is that it's recorded whenever the phone connects to a new tower.
#5 (again assuming #3) is that it's woefully inaccurate at tracking the user: all it logs to the file is the location of cell towers it has communicated with, so if you're talking to a tower that is hundreds of miles away, its only accurate to hundreds of miles. This would explain why my phone's map shows communications with a tower in fucking Newport, OR when I haven't ever been there with this phone, and doesn't show a single point within half a mile of my apartment.
#6 it is encrypted in device backups, and it's not on the phone because it'd be pointless to encrypt it on the phone as the keys have to be available for the phone to access the contents of the file and thus encrypting it would merely provide the illusion of security as any code running as root on the device would be able to find the keys and decrypt the file.
#7, 8, and 9 are probably more for crapple to explain, but I'd guess that their explanation will be something like "this data isn't collected by crapple, it's locally stored on the phone and thus contained in device backups on any computer it's backed up by. It's disclosed to absolutely nobody, including crapple, and because it's not shared with anyone including us, there are no conflicts with crapple's privacy policy and this kind of logging."
Also, quite a lot of these questions were answered by the security group that did the original research, and have been completely blown out of proportion by the press reporting on it.
L'unico problema è che di default (c'è la spunta) il backup di iphone non è encrypted, quindi uno con accesso fisico al PC/Mac può leggere il consolidated.sarcazzi con un programma tipo il PoC uscito per mac.
Ma "uno" non dovrebbe avere accesso fisico al vostro PC e nel caso mi preoccuperei di altro...